Jiliko Research: JILI Official vs Game Sheet | 42 Games

The short answer

For 42 JILI slots we set two documents from the same side of the industry against each other: the official JILI product page and the one-page game sheet published under the TaDa Gaming name for the same title. Where both state a maximum win, they agree on 32 of 34 titles and disagree on 2. Where both state a volatility label, they agree on 32 of 41 and disagree on 9. In total, 11 of the 42 titles carry at least one conflict.

This note belongs to the Jiliko research journal and uses the same product records as the game files on Jiliko. It is Jiliko editorial analysis of the 42 official game sheets captured on 24 September 2026, not a play test.

The headline is simple: most of the time the two documents agree, and when they do not, nothing on either page tells you which one is out of date. 27 titles match on both fields. The 11 that do not are listed in full further down, each with both values as printed.

What was compared, and how

Both sources were captured on 24 September 2026. The comparison uses two fields only: the published maximum win and the volatility label. Labels were normalised before counting, so that LOW-MED, Low Med and Low-Medium count as the same value, and a blank field counts as not stated rather than as a disagreement.

The two documents

The JILI product page is the public game page on JILI’s own catalogue. It lists a volatility label, a maximum win, a payout structure, a release month and a few feature bullets. It is the page every Jiliko game file cites.

The game sheet is a one-page PDF published for the same title under the TaDa Gaming name, which distributes JILI games under its own brand. The older layout lists total RTP, the split between base game and bonus RTP, hit frequency, volatility, a maximum payout and bet limits in euro. A newer layout, used by 6 of the sheets, is a compact information card that gives the maximum payout as a euro amount rather than a multiple. The file captured for Legacy of Egypt contains no machine-readable text, so its fields are blank here.

How labels were normalised

The sheets spell volatility 7 different ways. Before counting, each spelling was mapped to one value on a five-step scale: Low, Low-Medium, Medium, Medium-High and High. LOW-MED and Low Med both become Low-Medium; MED and Med become Medium; HIGH-MED and Med High both become Medium-High, because both describe the step between Medium and High. The table shows what each source actually uses.

Maximum-win values were read as whole multiples (3,000x and 3000 are the same number). Only the older sheet layout states a multiple, so the newer euro-only cards count as not stated in the main tally and are examined separately below.

Maximum win: 2 disagreements in 34

The maximum is the field most readers look at first, and it is also the field where the two documents agree most often. 8 sheets state no maximum at all, so the check covers 34 titles, not 42.

The two titles that disagree

Sin City has the widest gap. The product page advertises 4,500x; the sheet says 3,000x. WILD ACE runs the other way: 1,000x on the product page and 1,500x on the sheet, so the sheet is not simply the more cautious document.

The Sin City sheet has a further oddity. Every performance figure on it, from the 96.99% total RTP to the 24.01% hit frequency, the 3,000x maximum and the MED label, is identical to the figures on the sheet for Sweet land, a candy cluster game whose product page also states 3,000x. Two different games sharing one figure set to the second decimal place is possible, but it is also what a copied template looks like.

A worked example in pesos

At a ₱10 total stake, Sin City’s product-page ceiling is ₱45,000 and the sheet ceiling is ₱30,000, a ₱15,000 difference on the rarest possible result. For Wild Ace the same stake gives ₱10,000 against ₱15,000. These are ceilings, not expectations: they say nothing about a normal session, and an operator can apply its own win cap.

The newer sheets that give a euro cap

6 sheets state a maximum payout in euro next to a maximum bet in euro. Dividing one by the other gives an implied multiple. This is our arithmetic, not a figure either document prints, so these rows are kept out of the main count. The implied multiple matches the product page for 4 of 6; it does not for Trial of Phoenix and Diamond Party.

A euro cap can be a payout limit that applies at every stake rather than a multiple of one stake, so a mismatch here is weaker evidence than a printed multiple. It is still a reason to read the in-game rules for those two titles.

Volatility: 9 disagreements in 41

Volatility conflicts are more common than maximum-win conflicts. In 7 of the 9 cases the sheet sits lower on the scale than the product page, and in 2 it sits higher. 2 titles are two steps apart, not one.

Which way the labels move

• Sheet lower than the product page: 7 titles: Trial of Phoenix, King Arthur, Aztec Priestess, Fortune Monkey, Master Tiger, Mega Ace, Chin Shi Huang.
• Sheet higher than the product page: 2 titles, 40 Sparkling Crown and Safari Mystery.
• Two steps apart: Aztec Priestess (Medium / LOW) and Chin Shi Huang (High / MED).

Aztec Priestess is the clearest case to read carefully. Its product page describes a 5x6x6x6x6x5 reel pattern with 32,400 ways. The sheet filed under the same product number opens with “Welcome to Candy Land” and a 7x7 board, the same text as the Sweet land sheet. Its LOW label and 37.34% hit frequency may therefore describe a different game altogether. That is a strong reason not to use this particular sheet for Aztec Priestess at all.

A volatility label is a provider classification. The volatility guide explains why it cannot replace a spending limit, whichever document it comes from.

All 11 conflicts in one table

Every disagreement found in the two fields is listed below, with both values exactly as each document prints them. Titles that have a Jiliko game file link to it.

Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.

9 of the 11 titles have a Jiliko game file. The other two, Mega Ace and Chin Shi Huang, are not yet in the Jiliko collection, so they appear as plain text.

Why one maker’s documents can disagree

Neither document says which one is current, and this note does not decide it for them. What the files do show are several ordinary ways two official documents can drift apart.

Different builds of one game

A slot is rarely one fixed product. 9 of the 41 sheets that state an RTP list more than one total RTP, which means the same title ships in several configurations. A maximum or a volatility label can change between configurations or between versions, and a page written for one build can outlive it.

Two label scales

The product pages use four values: Low-Medium, Medium, Medium-High, High. The sheets also use four, but not the same four: Low, Low-Medium, Medium, Medium-High. Low appears on 2 sheets and never on a product page; High appears on 1 product page and never on a sheet. When two documents do not share a scale, some one-step differences may be translation between scales rather than a real change.

Copied templates

The Sin City and Sweet land sheets share an identical figure set, and the Aztec Priestess sheet carries Sweet land’s description. A one-page sheet built from the previous one is an easy place for a figure to survive from another title.

Documents written at different times

The newer sheets give a release quarter. For all 4 that do, the quarter differs from the release month on the product page; for example, 40 Sparkling Crown’s sheet says 2025 Q3 while the product page gives 2026-03. Documents that disagree on a date were probably not written from the same record at the same time.

This is a different problem from a single page contradicting itself. That case, where one product page gives two line counts, is covered in when the line count does not agree.

How the Jiliko game files line up

16 of the 42 titles have their own Jiliko game file. We checked the maximum and volatility label those files display against both documents.

Every one of the 16 files matches the JILI product page on both the maximum (16 of 16) and the volatility label (16 of 16). Jiliko writes the labels in JILI’s short form, so Medium-High appears as HIGH-MED, but the value is the same. That consistency has a consequence: wherever the sheet disagrees with the product page, it also disagrees with the Jiliko file.

Those 9 files now carry a short source note that names the sheet value and links here, instead of silently switching to either number. The files still show no RTP figure, because the product pages they cite do not publish one; the RTP percentages on the sheets are a separate question covered in the RTP guide.

What to trust when you open the game

The only document that describes the exact game in front of you is the paytable or information screen inside that game. Two outside documents that disagree tell you to look there before relying on either figure.

• Open the information or paytable screen inside the game you are about to play. It belongs to that build and that operator configuration, which neither outside document can promise.
• Look for the maximum-win statement and any win cap in the rules. If the game states a figure, that figure outranks both documents in this note.
• Read the volatility indicator if the game shows one. Sin City’s own loading screen, pictured above, carries a volatility gauge.
• Do not average two conflicting numbers or pick the more attractive one. A conflict means the figure is unconfirmed, not that the truth lies in between.
• Set the spending limit before looking at either number. A higher printed ceiling does not change what a session costs.

If you find a game whose in-game screen differs from its Jiliko file, the contact page explains how to send the detail so the file can be corrected.

What this check does not show

This is a document comparison, not a measurement of any game.

• Two fields only. The sheets also list RTP, hit frequency and bet limits that the product pages do not publish, so those cannot be compared here.
• One capture date. Both sources were read on 24 September 2026, and either can be updated after that.
• 42 titles, not the whole catalogue. The set is the JILI titles for which a game sheet could be captured; 16 of them are in the Jiliko collection.
• No ruling on which is correct. Neither document is dated at the level of a build, and this note does not guess.
• No gameplay. Nothing here comes from playing the games; it is a comparison of published text.

Questions readers ask

Short answers drawn from the tables above.

21+ only. Treat any slot as paid entertainment with a limit set before you start.

Related reading

• Jiliko Research: JILI 3x3 Slots Compared
• JILI slots Philippines: the research shortlist